Volunteering in public
gardens seems a big new trend. Basically – the idea is that public
gardens, such as those owned by Britain's National Trust, use
volunteers to help maintain their gardens. A great idea? Not
according to gardener Rachel Cassidy who wrote about this recently on Thinking Gardens.
I was initially inclined to be
sympathetic to her viewpoint, except that I knew sometimes volunteers
can do a fantastic job. Many of us have heard horror stories of
volunteers pruning the wrong tree, weeding out the wrong plants etc.,
but then trainee gardeners and apprentice do this too. I discussed
this piece with a couple of National Trust gardeners I know. One,
let's call him Roger, basically agreed with Rachel's posting, but did
say that about a third of the volunteers in his garden are
“fantastic”. To me that sounds quite significant, but it was the
others who are a worry. He works in a small NT garden however and
there are no staff with much experience of selecting or managing
volunteers – crucial!
The reason volunteers
are being promoted is clearly to save money. Its obviously a strategy
of 'having to'. Looking at it more broadly, it is all a part of the
'Big Society' idea. This was launched by our Prime Minister David
Cameron, some time ago, as part of a regeneration of civic
responsibility, that society benefits if everyone does some voluntary
work. I tend to instantly distrust anything said by a Conservative
politician but this did strike me at the time as being good and
sensible, but then along came the recession and a government
hell-bent on 'austerity'. The Big Society soon became an excuse to
save money, and slash budgets for all the services that government
provide, and which anyone in the civilised world outside the American
Tea Party brigade expects them to provide. The whole concept of
volunteering is in danger of being undermined by using it in a
cynical attempt to plug holes in budgets. We await a call for
volunteer heart surgeons.
Back to the garden.
Volunteers are used very extensively in some public gardens in the
US. I've talked to colleagues there about this and there seems to be
a general agreement that they work well. Part of this I suspect is
that in big cities there are a lot of people who have good gardening
skills who simply do not have anything more than a couple of pots on
a windowsill to exercise their gardening skills on, so volunteers
tend to be good gardeners.
Volunteers of course,
need managing, which is one of Rachel's points. Some big American
gardens have a volunteer manager whose job it is solely to organise
volunteers, but realistically very few gardens are going to have the
resources to do this, which means that managing volunteers becomes
the task of garden staff who have no experience in managing people.
Time to point out that a lot of people go into gardening precisely
because they do not want to manage people and are no good at it.
Another NT gardener I
spoke to, works in a much larger garden. John describes how “we
have a recruitment process, we select carefully, we interview”. The
Trust, he says “is a social organisation and providing volunteering
opportunities is part of that, and so it is a two way process, we
provide a social sphere and training and they help us”.
There is no doubt that
many volunteers are people who are really committed to the garden and
to good gardening and who make a massive difference. In a world where
we have a growing number of fit and healthy retired people who want
to do something, continue to make a contribution, and, to be honest,
get out of the house and make themselves useful, then volunteering in
public gardens strikes me as a splendid thing for them to be doing.
Does Rachel's point
that volunteers undermine gardening as a profession stand up? I think
that it is possibly too early to tell. Using volunteers is still
relatively new. In the old style Victorian garden there were often
huge numbers of gardeners who the Head Gardener and sometimes his
deputies had to manage. Management was part of the job. It is only
since those days, as garden staffs have shrunk, that management has
dropped by the wayside. I can actually see a situation where
gardeners who are good at management of volunteers, or who have
received training in doing so, will be able to lever higher pay for
doing so.
A point I would make,
from the point of view of someone who promotes naturalistic planting,
is that using volunteers might enable old-fashioned high levels of
garden maintenance to continue unchecked. I think it was Nick Macer
of Pan-Global Plants who said to me many years ago that some of
Britain's best gardens have been through a period of neglect, during
which time things happen that would not be allowed to happen in a
traditionally, highly-maintained garden. Things like lilies seeding
into lawns, trees developing interesting bendy shapes, shrubs
suckering into impressive thickets. One of the things I can't stand
about so many National Trust gardens is that they are so
overmaintained: too much bare earth, crisp lawn edgings, plants kept
rigidly separate. One of the drivers towards naturalistic,
sustainable and biodiverse planting is the need to reduce
maintenance. We will never see gardeners or garden owners try to
develop complex ornamental low-maintenance plant communities if there
is an army of volunteers ready to weed out anything that steps out of
line.
Its a balancing act,
like so much in life. Probably the best thing to conclude is that
volunteering in gardening is here to stay, at least in the
English-speaking world, and that it can be a very positive experience
for all concerned, but does need commitment and continued assessment.
I might even put out an appeal for some in our garden!
* * * * *
SUPPORT THIS BLOG
I write this blog unpaid (of course)
and try to do two postings a month, to try to provide the garden,
wildflower and plant-loving community with information, inspiration
and ideas. Keeping it coming is not always easy to fit into a busy
working life. I would very much appreciate it if readers would 'chip
in' (as we say in England) and provide a little financial support.
After all, you pay for magazines and books, and it is only for
historical reasons that the internet is free. Some money coming in
will help me to improve quality and frequency, and to start to
provide more coherent access to hard information, which I know is
what a lot of you really want. So – please donate now!! You can do
this through PayPal using email address: noelk57@gmail.com
Thank you!
And thank you too to the folk who have contributed so far.
********