Pages

Friday, October 27, 2017

Overwhelmed by garden books?



Books.
Many gardeners accumulate as many books as they do plant species. Now that we are moving, I face the problem of culling an extensive library that has not had a serious edit since we came to this part of Herefordshire twelve years ago. It is an interesting exercise, sometimes difficult, sometimes painful, but strangely cathartic. And it makes me ponder on the relationship between books, gardening and gardeners.
I am sure gardeners write more, read more, and accumulate more books than other hobbyists or semi-professional activities. Whereas most beekeepers, dog-breeders, potters and embroiderers probably have a good shelf or two, I don't think they have the multiple-shelf-verging-onto-libraries that many gardeners have. Why is this?
Partly I suppose it's because modern gardening has a great deal to do with information. Whereas the traditional core of gardening is a craft set of skills and intuitive abilities, the kind of gardening we indulge in (if hobbyists) or profess (if well.... professionals) is both an art and a science. The former implies constant change and the expression of different and often rival ideas, and the latter the access to hard data. We want to know what Dan Pearson thinks of Veronicastrum virginicum as well as what conditions the Veronicastrum likes to grow in (we do not however have so great an interest in what conditions Dan Pearson likes to live in – there is no 'Hello' magazine of the garden world and I am not sure there is even a functioning gossip column anywhere).
Gardeners, and their surprisingly modern colleagues - garden designers, are also great writers and communicators. More so than those of many other fields of human endeavour. There seems to be a strong urge to share and broadcast ideas, knowledge and opinions. Gardening is after all a surprisingly social business. The plantsman always seeks the new, and this is usually gained through some interaction with others: the garden visit, the club meeting, or a nursery fair. Transmitting ideas through print (or its modern digital equivalent) is the next most obvious thing.


Gardening and garden design are lucky in that they do seem to attract people who actually like writing and do it well. Communicating ideas in print does seem to be a real expectation at a particular point in someone's career. The result is an awful lot of books. The garden book has become a genre in itself, and one that has benefited enormously from all the technological advances in printing technology and colour photography of the last few decades.

Inevitably the books accumulate which raises the question – when you are getting ready to move, as we are. What do you keep? and what do you give away or sell second-hand? Books are heavy, gardening books particularly so, because of all that china clay smeared over the paper to create a nice photo-friendly gloss. You don't want to be carting too many of them up and down stairs, into and out of vans, etc. Starting with reference books, I find I'm hardly getting rid of any. The internet has of course become the first point-of-reference but it has huge limitations. Put in a plant name and very often it is nursery sites which come up; it can be very difficult to find more dispassionate sources, or which tell you anything else about the plant. Websites often just give bald data: height, flowering time, hardiness zone etc., but none of the subjectivity and opinion that gives the text in a book real character, and which is often far more useful in making decisions about whether to grow something or not. Nothing online comes anywhere near the dry wit of Henk Gerritssen in Dream Plants for the Natural Garden or the measured aristocratic snootiness of Graham Stuart Thomas in Perennial Garden Plants, Or, The Modern Florilegium: A Concise Account of Herbaceous Plants, Including Bulbs, for General Garden Use. Such a wonderfully 18th century title.

Books about gardens or by designers are a different matter. So many are inevitably in the much sneered-at 'coffee table' category. Publishers also have a high turnover, so the same book concept basically gets published every few years, with different authors and photographers. I shall never forget a commissioning editor saying to me “we haven't done a small gardens book for five years, its time we did another one”, implication of “it's your turn”. The advances in colour repro also mean that what may have looked stunning ten years ago, now looks dated and fuzzy.  A lot of writing about design is fuzzy too; there is little real hard analysis of why some designs work and others don't. Designers writing about their own work is often a disaster, they lack the perspective to 'stand outside their own work', to explain how it functions, let alone to look at it critically. As you may have guessed, an awful lot of these end up on the 'go to second hand' pile.

Old magazines are going out too. There is always the Lindley Library in London to go through anyway. And increasingly, contents are available online, as with The Hardy Plant Society Journal
How often do I refer back to the carefully ordered copies of The Garden that took up nearly two metres on my shelves? Almost never. Out they go. Hortus? Collective noun for a pile of Hortuses; the classicist might suggest 'Horti', I would suggest a 'smug' - some very good writing in it, and far too nice to put out in the recycling, but always so oddly unchallenging and unquestioning - 'gardens of a golden afternoon' type complacency. So they are on ebay, unless someone wants to come and pick them up. Any offers?

In going through books I am reminded of some real gems, classics that stand out and in many cases, deserve to be better known: Andrew Lawson's The Gardener's Book Of Colour, The Inward Garden by Julie Moir Messervy (a psychological approach to garden design, quite unique) Plant-Driven Design by Lauren Springer and Scott Ogden. The common thread being a unique approach, a singular vision, stepping outside the box. When so much in garden publishing is so samey, such individuality is all the more important.





7 comments:

  1. I enjoyed this post, but you neglected to mention one factor in the accumulation of garden books if you happen to write a garden blog with even a very modest readership: the availability of free review books from publishers, which I personally find very difficult to turn down. There is certainly a great deal of repetition in the world of garden books - I mean, how many books about Sissinghurst have something original to say? On the other hand, I come away from reading your post with a list of books that I don't have yet and that I'm determined to possess.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Inward Garden: that book convinced me that gardening could be about more than aesthetics. I go back to it for inspiration and without question it has influenced the direction I've taken in my own garden, Glen Villa. (www.siteandinsight.com)

    I am soon to face a move and culling gardening books is one of the big challenges.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Noel, speaking of garden books...I just finished reading your book Hybrid, not my own but borrowed from the local library. Thank you, I loved it and it is now helping me in a new writing project, another book of course.
    Best in the move and in deciding where to house your book treasury.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you Noel, well-written. I, too, have quite a library of garden books which is a ready deterrent to thinking about moving. My periodicals have evolved into a dwindling pile of clippings of "only the important ones," which on later review often turn out to be less important than I thought they were only a few years ago.

    I haven't come across the Inward Garden but will put it today on my list to read. I'm partial to garden essays myself; resources books second, and like you, "coffee-table" books are no longer so welcome. I agree about the classics of Springer-Ogden (almost any of them), and I'm also partial to anything written by Sydney Eddison, Sara Stein, Allen Lacy, or Mirabel Osler.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you Noel. I moved last year and fudged the issue of 'decluttering' my garden books by putting the bulk of them in storage. I justified this on the basis that I have yet to move to a permanent home. But reading this has come just at the right time to inspire a a greater cull, which is imminent. Your post has re ignited my enthusiasm for the project. A few years ago, I did make a good start at grasping the nettle and got rid of most garden related magazines, including several years' worth of the SGD's Garden Design Journal, which The Garden Museum were happy to receive as a donation. Your decision to move to Portugal is also inspiring – bravo! Ruth Chivers

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you Noel. I moved last year and fudged the issue of 'decluttering' my garden books by putting the bulk of them in storage. I justified this on the basis that I have yet to move to a permanent home. But reading this has come just at the right time to inspire a a greater cull, which is imminent. Your post has re ignited my enthusiasm for the project. A few years ago, I did make a good start at grasping the nettle and got rid of most garden related magazines, including several years' worth of the SGD's Garden Design Journal, which The Garden Museum were happy to receive as a donation. Your decision to move to Portugal is also inspiring – bravo! Ruth Chivers

    ReplyDelete
  7. I liked your thesis about gardeners being particularly bibliophilic and into writing. Never thought of it that way before, but I guess you are right. It certainly applies to me (piles and boxes full of plant-related books in every room, for lack of more shelves) and apparently always has. My parents recorded my first ever uttered wish of what I wanted to be/ become "when I grow up" thus: "A gardener in summer and a writer in winter, because the flowers sleep in winter." I must have been three or four years old.

    Personally, apart from reference books I feel particularly drawn to anything with a historical or cultural slant to the subject: from biographies of plant hunters to the history of flower shops etc. as well as classic garden writing such as compilations of gardening columns.

    As for the many gardeners who take to writing: perhaps that's because practical gardening gives you not just new things to observe every time but also time to think and ponder?

    If you haven't moved yet: Good luck and all the best!
    If you already have: ditto, for settling in!

    ReplyDelete