Still mulling over our
recent trip to Japan, leading a privately-organised tour. It was my
second trip, and the first for most of the people in the group –
and probably their last – not, I hasten to add, because we had a
bad time, but because the country is so far away for most of us, that
it is one of those places that we probably won't go to again unless
we have a special interest. This has a distorting effect on the way
people see a country. Think of it the other way round – if you were
a Japanese person coming to visit Britain, and interested in gardens,
what would you do. Visit Sissinghurst, Great Dixter, London, maybe
Oxford and Stratford on Avon, and of course Edinburgh, and leave the
rest of the country unvisited. I once had a look at a Japanese book
on visiting British gardens – several swathes of the map in the
front were empty! Part of the thinking behind organising this tour
was to try to avoid this effect, so after all the must-see Kyoto
garden masterpieces we set off on a backroads tour, to visit places
tourists don't normally get to (Matsue and Hagi for those who really
want to know).
Yuko Nagamura, my co-guide on the tour, at Kinkakuji |
Here I would like to
explore the theme of 'looking at Japanese gardens' a bit more, in
particular the problems that those of us who are interested in garden
and planting design can actually learn from them. The trouble with
looking at gardens in Japan on a first trip, is that it can be very
difficult to concentrate – Japan is so overwhelming in its cultural
depth that the mind (and body) is constantly distracted, “have you
seen that paper shop, ohmygod, it is amazing, I never knew...... was
that really octopus ice cream in there? ...... ohmygod, I've just
found a cat café, they really exist” etc, etc, etc.
The garden at the Kikuya house in Hagi, Yamaguchi province, a lovely little-known garden |
The visitor also needs
to 'get their eye in', to know what to look for, to know what not to
look at. An art form like the Japanese garden is so profoundly alien
to much of our experience of gardens, that we tend to focus on the
surface, the immediate impact, and not be able to look deeper. We can
also be quite undiscriminating. Kyoto is so full of gardens that it
can be difficult to choose which to go to, or in what order. They
also vary a lot – some are definitely 'also-rans'; maintenance can
also vary, depending on who runs them; some I was alarmed to see have
gone down the “let's get the punters in with some night time
illuminations” road which results in obtrusive chunky lights and
cabling, or even moss lawns being covered in a web of wiring for LED
lights.
The Kinkakuji (Golden Temple). Incomparable, just because its gold doesn't make it flashy, its proportions and poistioning are perfect |
My Little Kitty likes Kinkajui too |
I have a tendency to
react against the sticking of certain cultural highlights on a
pedestal – I carefully avoided the Taj on my first visit to India,
and on my first time in Paris (many years ago) I never saw the Eiffel
Tower in a whole week! Icons are icons however for very good reasons.
The Golden Temple (Kinkaku-ji) is a good example I had not been to on
my first trip: perfectly proportioned, with an unspoilt backdrop of
wooded hills. It really is a breathtaking sight. However it is one of
those places where you are liable to take your partner's/friend's
photograph with the temple in the background and walk on. The
people-watching has to be seen as part of the pleasure. The vast
numbers of people who go there though prevent a real exploration of
what is actually quite a complex garden, as many paths are closed
off; so it cannot really be fully appreciated as a garden – its
subtle interplay of water, islands and pines. Instead the garden and
view become relegated to being a backdrop.
Appreciating Ryoan-ji |
Amongst garden
cognoscenti, it is the rock and sand landscape of Ryoan-ji which is
the most famous of all, an abstract composition which has always
fascinated western artists and commentators, who tend to see in it
the essence of Zen, and of Japan, or of their idea of Japan. That
Japan is more than abstract conundrums is shown by posters showing My
Little Kitty in her kimono standing in front of the Golden Temple, a
reminder that this country is actually more interested in colourful
cuddly kitsch than conundrums and koans. At Ryoan-ji MLK makes no
appearance and indeed this garden is nothing like as crowded as you
might think. No-one is having their photograph taken posing in front
of it, and no-one is waving a selfie-stick. Either this most
intellectual of gardens attracts a different clientele, or the garden
has a powerful effect on its visitors. It has to be viewed from a
raised verandah type structure which somehow focuses everyone's
attention on to the garden, and there are tiered steps to sit on, so
it is possible to experience the garden one-to-one as it were.
The Daitako-ji temple complex in Kyoto is the best 'one-stop' place to see some of the very best gardens |
I had agonised for
ages, and I don't think my group quite appreciated how much agonising
went into this planning, about what gardens to go to, in what order,
and on what day. Three days in Kyoto is hardly enough to even begin
realising just how much this extraordinary city can offer. Last time
I came, I spotted a guide to its art and craft galleries, it was the
size of an old-fashioned telephone directory. Beyond the city, our
attempts to 'get off the beaten track' led to some very complex train
journeys. Since the trains run like clockwork, and there is a very
comprehensive rail network, this can mean some terrifyingly tight
connections – six minutes to get from platform two to platform
seven etc. - 18 people, including one 86 year old. Every connection
worked though.
The Okoji-senso villa in Kyoto is a relatively modern, more naturalistic, little gem |
We do face a problem
in how we look at Japanese gardens I think.We tend to see sand,
stones, pine trees and not beyond. We also, inevitably, see them
through a veil of our experiences of western copies of them. In the
case of British visitors this is particularly unfortunate, as our
historical experience of Japanese gardens is rather a kitsch one.
Long ago I remember listening to a lecture by Jill Raggett who has
made a study of the Japanese garden in Britain – her doctoral
thesis and the study ‘Shadowy Figures’ Japanese Garden Designers
in Early Twentieth Century Britain, is unfortunately not published,
but is available through the Japan Society's e-library. There is some
information from her here. It seems that many
British examples were built by Japanese people in Britain who had no
particular knowledge of traditional garden building, I may be
exaggerating slightly, but I think one early 20th century
garden builder had come off a ship and found himself at a loose end
and got into it that way! Modern versions are mostly amateur built
and are very kitsch, to the extent that they actually have a negative
impact on how Japanese gardens are seen.
My belief about why
Japanese gardens work, is that they encapsulate certain spatial
relations which go directly to our sub-consciously hard-wired sense
of aesthetics – a bit like the best abstract art. Because of their
simplicity, the very best classical gardens, appeal to this directly.
I bet if you were able to boil down the formal relations between
plants in a Piet Oudolf border, the trees in a Capability Brown
landscape or the entire space of a Russell Page garden, you would
uncover the same basic relations. In fact there is a whole study
available here which shows just
this. and here is a news item summarising another study
Put people in front of a model of Ryoan-ji apparently, move the stones, and
people will find it less 'attractive'.
The Ensui-ji temple in Hagi, its relaxed style is more typical of many smaller temples |
Trouble is, actually
appreciating any of this requires a lot of Zen emptying of the mind,
trying to put aside the concerns of being a first-time traveller in
this extraordinary country and seeing through and beyond the mere
physicality of what is directly in front of us, the memory of the
last green tea macha latté with a cat drawn in the foam on top, the
complexity of this morning's breakfast (what do I eat first?) or
fretting about whether you will be able to catch the next train. But,
I firmly believe, that if we understood this most sophisticated of
art forms a bit better, it would help all of us as designers.
5 comments:
hi Noel, you clearly had a great trip in japan. I used to live and work in Tokyo as a market director for Mars. You soon learn that colours and images have a different impact in Japan. What we think of as kitsch they often think is classy. I suspect some of this different mind set must influence their garden design and could explain why in the west we find it so hard to produce good Japanese gardens. Never the less your blog has brought back many memories of Japan. I recently came across a new Thai garden you would be interested in https://glebehouse.wordpress.com/2016/12/19/an-unexpected-formal-garden/
that puts Thai temples in a whole new dimension.
Cheers
Steve horsfield
An great post with excellent pictures. Are there more pictures? Having spent some time in Japan, I learned, after a while, to stop analyzing and just look. Just let it soak in, and after a while your emotional reactions come to the fore, unencumbered with western preconceptions. You can see what you are meant to see, and it is very rewarding.
It would be nice to know more about how these gardens are created. Who made them? Did they evolve over time?
Again, thanks for a marvelous post.
Really enjoyable (and useful) article Noel - thank you. We are spending two weeks in Kyoto and elsewhere in April and it is good to hear your thoughts before we go. For me, certainly, spatial relations are the defining aesthetic factor in every garden.
Very interesting article! Having a big interest in Japanese gardens design and research for many years, I find your view a clear insight of how difficult it is for most westerns to see Japanese garden beauty and just be draw into its magic. I agree with Ed Morrow above when he mentions that sometimes we need to avoid the analyzing western way of seeing things and just watch, just be one with garden, just be... That is when the true beauty of the garden reveals itself, as we are also part of that same beauty, of nature and we fit perfectly because we are the same. That has to do with Japanese gardens being natural landscape gardens, made by man but representing untouched nature... Somehow that connects with our inner self and speaks to our mind as we stop "listening" to that outer noise you mentioned of our ordinary busy lifes,, and only listen to our heart, live the moment, appreciate the little things, exist.
Thank you!
Hey Noel
Thanks for your thought provoking blog of your Japan garden trip. In 2014 I organised a similar adventure & can empathise with the planning that goes into making a successful adventure & the subsequent thoughts of wanting participants to 'get' what they observe. For me this lasted 4-5 days before realising that we clutch our perspective such that for some time it's not possible to see but only to relate. That relating can only come from our individual perspective & our personal history that has woven it.
On noticing this within my travel companions the weight of concern was lifted & I too could begin the experience of seeing.
At this time an issue with western style Japanese gardens that I see is a distinct lack of understanding of the plants, their development & how their positioning & upkeep bear on the three dimensional composition.
Refreshing article. Thanks
Rob Knott
Post a Comment