Three year old street planting in Vilnius, Lithuania |
At home after some
very interesting travelling. I blogged before aboutLatvia and particularly Lithuania. And then Poland, which
has a very organised wholesale nursery industry but no real
organisation for domestic gardening. Ten days or so at home and then
running a workshop in Italy for the Valfredda nursery near Bergamo.
Something of a culture shock. Actually that is the first time that I
have been asked to lecture or teach south or west of the Alps;
something I think which highlights the deep cultural divide in Europe
over attitudes to nature and its expression in naturalistic planting.
Using perennials in
Italy is relatively new. There is a kind of obvious reason for this
in that Mediterranean climates, with their dry summers do not favour
the growth of plants which need summer moisture, as most perennials
do. Just before the lecture started, the presence of two Russian
students led me to musing about as a gardener how much more at home I
feel in Russia, which may have a very different climate to ours but
which at least allows the kind of plants I am familiar with to do
very well. Italy of course is at least as divided in gardening terms
as it is in every other way: regional cuisines, language and
political culture. It is only partly 'Mediterranean' - there are in
fact plenty of areas where the water table or moister microclimates,
or altitude, allow for good perennial growth.
Seven year old pot-grown Miscanthus at Valfredda |
Italian planting
design has tended to be very conservative, at least what you see
publicly, and garden design generally to be dominated by evergreen
shrubs, which after all, are the most ecologically appropriate plants
for much of the country. This is however, an incredibly
design-focussed culture, so it will be interesting to see what
happens to planting design here. Grasses at least seem to be making a
big impact in the little exhibition spaces around Bergamo which are
set up for the annual conference held here in September. On this
subject, it was interesting to see the enormous pots of grasses
dotted around the Valfredda nursery – these are used for when the
company do exhibitions or trade shows. Some of the miscanthus or
panicum grown like this have been in the containers for five to seven
years.
The big divide in
European planting design does seem to be around the question of 'is
nature beautiful?'. I have always read about this from garden history
in terms of an attitude that dates back to the Renaissance, of nature
only being beautiful when shaped by the hand of Man (male gender,
capital letter), Man being the image of God (ditto!). How much of
this is down to Catholicism or Renaissance Humanism I don't know. The
other Europe: Germanic/Scandinavian/Slavic/Baltic has a love of
nature for its own sake which is quite different; always expressed
with an inappropriate definite article, as in “we love the
nature”, which further stresses its singularity and importance. I
suppose a cultural historian might put this down to a residual
paganism which gives untrammelled nature a value which it lacks
elsewhere.
What about the
British? I hear you ask! My immediate answer is to reach up onto the
bookshelf to get out Keith Thomas's monumental study Religion and the
Decline of Magic of 1971, and think about re-reading it. My gut
reaction is that in many ways we are a sort of in-between: like our
language (German grammar and core vocabulary, plus Latin vocab)
something of a hybrid. The British love nature but we don't really
understand what it is, as a cultural landscape of fields and hedges
has long since replaced the real thing. Above all we have very little
woodland, and indeed sniff at dense forest as somehow 'germanic' and
therefore not to be trusted.
Basically, I would
guess that the great wave of interest in perennials that kicked off
in northern Europe in the 1990s is finally reaching southern Europe
(see a previous post).
However up and over in eastern Europe the interest in perennials is
totally climate-appropriate in the way that it is not so in southern
Europe, the idea of naturalistic planting is immediately understood,
and – crucially, the economies of most of these countries are now
at a level whereby there is, increasingly, money for ornamental
private gardens and quality public planting. Some of the most
large-scale and best work seems to be happening in Russia, thanks to Anna Andreyeva. Lithuania
and Latvia show great promise, as I have flagged up before.
The Italian nursery I
worked with – Valfredda, and the nurseries emerging in eastern
Europe (which mostly seem to be in Poland) currently offer a very
similar range of perennials to what we might expect in Britain or
Holland. There is a great danger that a successful roll out of these,
especially in public places, might lead to a boredom factor kicking
in. What is currently lacking appears to be R&D – developing
new varieties. New cultivars and hybrids developed which are
climate-appropriate will enable these emerging perennial markets to
improve their sustainability and to develop local character. More
important still will be collection from the wild. Italy has pretty
good biodiversity, as do Spain and Portugal, and the geographical and
climatic complexity of this whole region means there must be plenty
of garden-worthy species awaiting discovery, or distinct forms of
already established species.
Eastern Europe can, in
theory call on the vastness of the Eurasian landmass for new hardy
species for cultivation. They will need to, as the geography
(predominantly flat) and geological history mean that there is little
local genetic differentiation amongst plant species, until you get
down as far south as Romania and Bulgaria, both still 'off the map'
in terms of gardening innovation. There is a problem though, and that
is that eastern Europe has so firmly set itself looking westwards,
away from the old tyrant to the east, that any thought of going plant
hunting in Russia or central Asia is a non-starter. An older
generation had Russian as a common language (something the
non-Russians could all moan about the Russians in) but a younger one
went wholesale for English around 1990 (my wife Jo was involved in
training English teachers in Slovakia in the early 1990s). East
European botanists and plantspeople may have been forbidden from
travelling west but the whole vast Soviet empire was open to them; it
was interesting a few weeks ago to hear Janis Ruksans, the Latvian
bulb expert, reminisce about looking for bulbs in Soviet central
Asia. Much as we are all glad for the political changes there is a
sadness in seeing this common scientific culture and language
disappear. Also sad to hear about is the personal divide between the
western-looking republics and Russia. I once suggested to an east
European colleague that she invite a certain Russian landscape
architect to speak (incidentally known for their liberal views), I
was told a firm “no, we're not ready for that yet”. But she's not
going to arrive in a tank!
Serious planting
hunting and new introductions will almost inevitably depend on
Russian plantspeople and nurseries looking east and not just growing
western-developed species and cultivars, which they all seem to do at
the moment. I haven't heard of any Russian plant hunters yet – I
very much look forward to doing so. We would all greatly benefit. As
we would from some Italian ones.
1 comment:
I love your big picture perspective recently on our garden cultures depending on different regions in relation to climate and post-Soviet political change in Europe in your blog posts. It is a good reminder why we value the particular plants and garden styles that we do, and does our gardening/landscape designing reflect a sense of our place vs, current fashion/fad, no matter how low maintenance/ecological footprint.
Thank you for sharing these impressions as you travel and interact/teach/consult. Very few are as diversely experienced as you to provide these perspectives.
Post a Comment